Why the depiction of a black Madonna and child in European art? Are these unfounded notions, or are these depictions birthed from historical reality? A reality that would eventually become hidden, suppressed, and deemed politically incorrect?
Sorry....not really because you weren't when you lied intentionally and depicted the Fierce Black Hebrew Messiah as a gay, pansy-looking white man for the purposes of misdirection, manipulation, and sending billions of people to Hell 1 MACCABEES 3:48 “And laid open the book of the law, wherein the heathen had sought to paint the likeness of their images.” #HEATHENS = #EDOMITES AMONG ALL OTHER NATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE TRUE BLACK TRIBES OF YISRAEL WHO HAVE WARRED AGAINST US & YAHUVEH…
Before the Renaissance period all of the biblical icons all over the world depicting Yahushua was of this image until they were all changed. This is the TRUE image of our Savior,The Messiah! 1 Maccabees 3:48 And Laid Open the Book of the Law,wherein the heathen had sought to paint the likeness of their images. ...Apocrypha KJV Holy Bible the 14 Books missing out of the Bible. Get and read the Apocrypha it contains information that was hidden from us who seek the truth.
Answer: In the one hundred and sixtieth year, Alexander Epiphanes, son of Antiochus, came up and took Ptolemais (1 Maccabees 10:1). The year cannot possibly refer to B.C./A.D., since Jesus had not been born yet and the author of the books of Maccabees couldn't possibly know what year the messiah would be born. The "160th year" is referring to the Seleucid calendar. The calendar dates from Seleucus I Nicator's re-conquest of Babylon. Continue READING -> click "Visit" #QUICKQUESITONS